The choice of isolation level depends on the kind of task an application is performing. This section gives some guidelines for choosing isolation levels.

To choose an appropriate isolation level, you must balance the need for consistency and accuracy with the need for concurrent transactions to proceed unimpeded. If a transaction involves only one or two specific values in one table, it is unlikely to interfere as much with other processes compared to one that searches many large tables and therefore may need to lock many rows or entire tables and may take a very long time to complete.

For example, if your transactions involve transferring money between bank accounts, you likely want to ensure that the information you return is correct. On the other hand, if you just want a rough estimate of the proportion of inactive accounts, then you may not care whether your transaction waits for others or not, and you may be willing to sacrifice some accuracy to avoid interfering with other users of the database.

Furthermore, a transfer may affect only the two rows which contain the two account balances, whereas all the accounts must be read to calculate the estimate. For this reason, the transfer is less likely to delay other transactions.

SQL Anywhere provides four isolation levels: levels 0, 1, 2, and 3. Level 3 provides complete isolation and ensures that transactions are interleaved in such a manner that the schedule is serializable.

If you have enabled snapshot isolation for a database, then three additional isolation levels are available: snapshot, statement-snapshot, and readonly-statement-snapshot.

Choosing a snapshot isolation level

Snapshot isolation offers both concurrency and consistency benefits. Using snapshot isolation incurs a cost penalty since old versions of rows are saved as long as they may be needed by running transactions. Therefore, long running snapshots can require storage of many old row versions. Usually, snapshots used for statement-snapshot do not last as long as those for snapshot. Therefore, statement-snapshot may have some space advantages over snapshot at the cost of less consistency (every statement within the transaction sees the database at a different point in time).

For more information about the performance implications of using snapshot isolation, see Cursor sensitivity and isolation levels.

For most purposes, the snapshot isolation level is recommended because it provides a single view of the database for the entire transaction.

The statement-snapshot isolation level provides less consistency, but may be useful in cases where long running transactions result in too much space being used in the temporary file by the version store.

The readonly-statement-snapshot isolation level provides somewhat less consistency than statement-snapshot, but avoids the possibility of update conflicts. Therefore, it is most appropriate for porting applications originally intended to run under different isolation levels.

For more information about snapshot isolation, see Snapshot isolation.